October Term 2011 · decided Mar 20, 2012
Daniel Coleman, Petitioner v. Court of Appeals of Maryland et al.
In plain language
- Daniel Coleman, Petitioner v. Court of Appeals of Maryland et al., OT 2011, March 20, 2012.
- Citation: 566 U.S. 30.
- Vote: 5 to 4.
- Issue area: Federalism.
Recorded metadata
Decided 2012-03-20 (October Term 2011). Citation: 566 U.S. 30. Vote: 5–4. Issue area: Federalism. (Metadata from the Supreme Court Database.)
How each justice voted
Concurrence (1)
Positions are recorded by the Supreme Court Database. A concurrence agrees with the outcome while writing or joining a separate opinion.